Which of the following statements is true about inclusionary testimony?

Inclusionary testimony is characterized by its reliance on firsthand accounts and observations relevant to a case. This type of testimony focuses on facts and events that the witness has directly seen or experienced, making it a critical aspect of establishing the credibility of the evidence presented. Witnesses providing inclusionary testimony offer information that directly pertains to the circumstances surrounding the case, rather than speculation or unverified opinions.

This stands in contrast to hearsay evidence, which involves statements made outside of court that are presented to prove the truth of the matter asserted and may lack the reliability of firsthand observations. Furthermore, inclusionary testimony does not generally rely on assumptions or conjectures; instead, it is rooted in direct experience. Lastly, while expert opinions can be valuable in legal contexts, inclusionary testimony is not characterized by guesses regarding case outcomes but rather concrete observations that inform the context and facts of the case. Therefore, focusing on the actual observed events is a defining feature of inclusionary testimony.