What is the court's likely ruling regarding the use of Dave's deposition in Casper's lawsuit?

The court's likely ruling that allows Casper to use Dave's deposition, but requires that he include all relevant parts, is grounded in principles of fairness and the integrity of the judicial process. When a deposition is taken in preparation for litigation, it is considered a part of the evidentiary record. Courts aim to provide a complete and accurate representation of evidence, so if a party wishes to introduce a deposition into court proceedings, it is essential that all relevant sections be included to maintain context and avoid misleading the court.

Including only certain favorable parts could distort the truth and lead to an unfair advantage, which is contrary to the ideals of justice. By requiring that all relevant parts be included, the court ensures that the testimony is presented in its entirety, allowing for appropriate cross-examination and evaluation of context. This approach promotes a balanced presentation of evidence and preserves the opposing party's ability to challenge the reliability and credibility of the statements made during the deposition.

The correct choice reflects a commitment to the principle that all relevant evidence must be considered when deciding a case, rather than allowing a selective portrayal that could misrepresent the facts. Other options imply restrictions or blanket permissions that do not align with equitable legal practices regarding the use of deposition materials.