What are some limitations on attorney-client privilege?

The correct choice highlights vital aspects of attorney-client privilege, specifically the crime-fraud exception, which is a significant limitation on the scope of this privilege. Under this exception, communications that are intended to facilitate or assist in committing a crime or fraud are not protected by attorney-client privilege. For legal professionals, it's crucial to recognize that if a client seeks legal advice to further ongoing or future illegal activities, those correspondences can be disclosed and are not shielded by privilege.

Additionally, the attorney-client privilege does not protect communications made in furtherance of future crimes or fraud. This principle underscores the ethical obligation of attorneys to avoid complicity in illegality and ensures that the legal system discourages the use of legal advice as a tool for unlawful purposes.

Understanding this limitation on attorney-client privilege is essential for those in the legal field, as it affects how attorneys must approach their relationships with clients. The other options fail to accurately represent the complexities of the privilege, either by asserting an erroneous absolutism or by inaccurately narrowing the limitations to specific contexts.