Under what condition can P's motion for summary judgment be granted?

The correct answer is that P's motion for summary judgment can be granted if P's proofs submitted show no genuine issue of material fact exists.

In the context of a motion for summary judgment, the moving party (in this case, P) must demonstrate that there are no genuine disputes regarding material facts that would affect the outcome of the case. Essentially, this means that if the evidence presented clearly establishes the position of P without any ambiguity or competing evidence from the opposing party, the court can grant summary judgment in favor of P. The pivotal aspect is the determination that the evidence shows a clear entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, without requiring a trial to resolve factual disputes.

This condition is critical because the purpose of a motion for summary judgment is to avoid unnecessary trials when there is no real issue to be tried. A well-supported motion that successfully negates any genuine issue of material fact can lead to a favorable ruling for the moving party, as there would be no basis for further litigation on those points.

Understanding the requirement that no genuine issues of material fact exist helps clarify the appropriateness of summary judgment in legal proceedings, focusing on the sufficiency and clarity of the evidence presented.